‘And I heard a voice from heaven, because the voice of many waters, and because the voice of an amazing thunder: and I heard the voice of harpers harping with their harps.’ That’s the E-book of Revelation, however the phrases would possibly as nicely have been spoken by an American anytime between the spiritual revivals of the 18th century and the chiliastic chat threads of immediately. Many horrible endings have come and gone in america: civil warfare, slavery, two world wars, assassinations, soiled wars, a Capitol stormed by hooligans. But the fact is in any other case: the world as we all know it, in all its magnificence and horror, thriller and terror, continues to be right here. Individuals proceed to assume in any other case, nevertheless—that, because the literary critic Frank Kermode as soon as urged, the apocalypse is perhaps true, or can not however be true, in a unique sense.
Within the spirit of Kermode, it will be rash to not acknowledge that if our digital communications networks are glutted with lakes of fireplace and speaking heads who converse in devilish tongues, it’s as a result of the sense of promise provided by political programs and new applied sciences has soured. And never solely that: sizzling wars, a warming local weather, and resurgent fascism are not unusual. Neither is an historic, ugly trope not too long ago poured into a brand new, environment-friendly bottle: that folks themselves are the issue. In 2018, the thinker Todd Could revealed an op-ed in The New York Occasions that requested ‘whether or not it will be a tragedy if the planet not contained human beings. And the reply I’m going to provide may appear puzzling at first. I wish to counsel, at the least tentatively, each that it will be a tragedy and that it’d simply be a great factor.’ To flee an apocalypse, in different phrases, we should cross not via the attention of a needle however one other apocalypse. For Could, an apocalypse is a morally fascinating resolution to issues like international warming. Name it the upper misanthropy. If something, the circularity of Could’s considering reinforces his sense of humanity being trapped by its personal ideas and units, digital or actual.
A second pressure of up to date antihumanism is promoted by tech tycoons like Elon Musk and Peter Thiel. They dream of latest types of human intelligence that can not be human, equivalent to synthetic basic intelligence or an embodied web. Why privilege the human mind, they ask, if computing energy can all the time leapfrog it, a lot in order that computer systems threaten to make considering by mere people superfluous. However the misanthropic attraction to ‘transhumanism’ – purpose untethered from the mind, and due to this fact pure – is itself a type of evangelism, not ‘Sinners within the Arms of an Indignant God’ however relatively ‘Concepts within the Service of Oligarchs’. The Silicon Valley gurus are promising enchantment of a perverse form: digital paradises of untrammeled considering and the cultivation of ecotopias not spoiled by human beings. Musk and Thiel, too, are harpers harping with their harps.
*
Forty-five years in the past – hardly a blink of the attention within the lengthy historical past of apocalyptic considering – the novelist and thinker Maurice Blanchot asserted in The Writing of Catastrophe that ‘We’re on the sting of catastrophe with out with the ability to situate it sooner or later.’ The rationale, he stated, is that catastrophe ‘is relatively all the time already previous’. What Blanchot meant is that catastrophe is acknowledged solely after it has occurred. On this sense, an apocalypse is rarely a revelation of one thing new; as an alternative, it reveals the unsettling dimensions of a world that we already know.
I used to be reminded of this through the COVID-19 pandemic. Because it occurred, though there was no snow on the bottom on the time I used to be excited about icebergs. ‘We’d relatively have the iceberg than the ship’, begins the primary stanza of Elizabeth Bishop’s poem The Imaginary Iceberg, which continues,
though it meant the top of journey.
Though it stood stock-still like cloudy rock
and all the ocean had been transferring marble.
Throughout that point these strains got here to me in all types of climate. The Imaginary Iceberg is a poem that I really like, though on the time I couldn’t bear in mind after I had final learn it. But there it was, its first 4 strains on repeat in my thoughts’s ear, a phantom verse.
It was March and I used to be in a small metropolis in jap Germany. The closest icebergs had been at the least 2,000 miles to the northwest. Quickly it grew to become tough to see a lot of something as a result of COVID-19 restrictions shrank my day by day ramble to the quick stroll between my condominium and workplace. There was well mannered grumbling in regards to the restrictions. That modified in April, when anti-vaxxers started to arrange weekly protests in Germany’s huge cities. Regardless of how clamorous these gatherings grew to become, they had been subdued in comparison with a typical response to the pandemic in america. The pastor David Jeremiah, who was one among President Trump’s evangelical advisers, puzzled if the virus was biblical prophecy, and known as the pandemic ‘essentially the most apocalyptic factor that has ever occurred to us’. Many People agreed: by the center of March, publishers in america had been reporting robust gross sales for books about apocalypse.
Because the weeks in lockdown handed and an apocalyptic fervour confirmed no indicators of fading, I got here to know what The Imaginary Iceberg was nudging me to listen to. The poem has three 11-line stanzas, and as they unfold the tight rhyme and rhythmical schemes established within the first stanza are progressively relaxed, the one exception being the rhyming couplets that finish every stanza. Bishop takes the poem’s metaphors in the other way, stressing self-containment and the lack of sight: ‘The iceberg cuts its sides from inside’. Starting innocently sufficient with an unambiguous assertion, the poem turns into a parable in regards to the risks of valuing the imaginary over the imagined, of treasuring an iceberg that’s ‘Like jewellery from a grave’, that ‘saves itself perpetually and adorns / solely itself’.
Bishop is cautioning towards surrendering the required work of notion and comprehension for the seduction of apocalyptic revelation, regardless of how engaging that could be. ‘We’d relatively have the iceberg than the ship, / though it meant the top of journey.’ Be cautious of how of considering that hinge on a catastrophic break between the current and the previous, I heard the poem saying. Bishop’s clever warning comes with a present: the size of an imaginary iceberg will be explored together with her as your information, even when you put an finish to journey.
Scene from the E-book of Apocalypse, France, c.fifteenth century. Picture by way of Wikimedia Commons
This text first appeared in IWM Put up (Spring/Summer time 2024). It’s revealed in collaboration with the Institute for Human Sciences (IWM).
